AI case study

King & Wood MallesonsContract negotiation analysis

Lenders' scattered comments hid real syndicate disagreement. Harvey tables issues, positions, outcomes—juniors shift to judgment, not review.

Published

Key results

Document Analysis Time
5 mins
vs 20 years of accumulated client documents reviewed manually
Treasury Review Time
1 hour
vs days of manual document review

Result highlights

Unlock 2 result highlights

The story

Context

An independent, top-tier Australian law firm with nearly two centuries of history, whose Banking and Finance practice represents large bank and non-bank syndicates in real estate finance and corporate treasury deals spanning decades-long client relationships.

Challenge

In syndicate financing deals, lenders each bring their own processes and credit requirements, leaving lawyers to manually sift through comments,...

Solution
Unlock full story

Quotes

Unlock 9 more quotes

The company

King & Wood Mallesons logo

King & Wood Mallesons

landing.kwm.com

Multinational law firm for corporate, finance, and M&A legal services.

IndustryProfessional Services
LocationHong Kong, Hong Kong
Employees5K-10K
Founded2012

The vendor

Harvey is a generative AI company that innovates the future of professional services with advanced AI solutions.

IndustryProfessional Services
LocationSan Francisco, California, United States
Employees251-1K
Founded2022

Use case

King & Wood Mallesons's Contract negotiation analysis is part of this use case:

Contract Analysis
46 case studies(+10% YoY)
Proven impact?
Average
3.8Typical
3.8Typicalwithin Professional Services
3.8Typicalwithin Legal & Compliance

Similar Case Studies

Related implementations across industries and use cases

47 AI case studies in Contract Analysis

194 AI case studies in Professional Services

172 AI case studies in Legal & Compliance